Data quality management for profiling, linking, cleansing, and migrating data

ABSTRACT

A data quality management system includes a rules repository configured to store profiling data quality rules, cleansing data quality rules, and linking data that links profiling data quality rules to cleansing data quality rules. The data quality management system also includes a rules management module configured to manage the rules repository. The data quality management system further includes a data quality job management module configured to migrate data quality rules from the rules repository to a data quality processing system and manage a data quality process performed by the data quality processing system using the migrated data quality rules.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation (and claims the benefit of priorityunder 35 USC 120) of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/159,504, filed Jan.21, 2014, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser.No. 13/194,135, filed Jul. 29, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,666,919, issuedMar. 4, 2014, and titled “Data Quality Management for Profiling,Linking, Cleansing, and Migrating Data.” Both of these priorapplications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD

This disclosure relates to data quality management.

BACKGROUND

A growing demand exists for data management solutions. As thesophistication of data warehousing and business intelligencearchitectures and solutions increases, the recognition of poor dataquality is becoming a barrier to success and has increased demand fordata quality services. In traditional data quality solutions, however,the effort to define and apply data quality rules may be laborintensive.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, a data quality management system includes a rulesrepository configured to store profiling data quality rules, cleansingdata quality rules, and linking data that links profiling data qualityrules to cleansing data quality rules. The data quality managementsystem also include a rules management module configured to manage therules repository by managing the profiling data quality rules stored inthe rules repository, managing the cleansing data quality rules storedin the rules repository, and managing the linking data stored in therules repository. The data quality management system further includes adata quality job management module configured to migrate data qualityrules from the rules repository to a data quality processing system andmanage a data quality process performed by the data quality processingsystem using the migrated data quality rules. The migrated data qualityrules include one or more linked pairs of data quality rules that have aprofiling data quality rule linked to a cleansing data quality rule bythe linking data and the data quality job management module isconfigured to control the data quality processing system to execute theone or more linked pairs of data quality rules. In another aspect, amethod may include one or more of the operations recited above as beingperformed by the data quality management system. In yet another aspect,a computer-readable storage medium may be operable to cause a processorto perform one or more of the operations described above as beingperformed by the data quality management system.

Implementations may include one or more of the following features. Forexample, the rules repository may be configured to store the profilingdata quality rules, the cleansing data quality rules, and the linkingdata in a generic format that is not specific to any particular dataquality processing system. The rules management module may be configuredto organize the profiling data quality rules and the cleansing dataquality rules by industry for a user to select a particular industry andreceive a subset of the profiling data quality rules and the cleansingdata quality rules that are relevant to the particular industry.

In addition, the data quality job management module may be configured tomonitor the data quality process performed by the data qualityprocessing system using the migrated data quality rules. The dataquality job management module may be configured to monitor an entireoperation of the data quality process performed by the data qualityprocessing system including monitoring results of data profilingperformed by the data quality processing system and monitoring resultsof data cleansing performed by the data quality processing system. Thedata quality job management module may be configured to control the dataquality processing system to execute the one or more linked pairs ofdata quality rules in a coordinated manner.

Further, the rules management module may be configured to accessinferred profiling and cleansing data quality rules and store theinferred profiling and cleansing data quality rules in the rulesrepository. The rules management module may be configured to receiveuser input defining a new profiling data quality rule and a newcleansing data quality rule and store the new profiling data qualityrule and the new cleansing data quality rule in the rules repository.

In some implementations, the rules management module may be configuredto receive user input linking the new profiling data quality rule to thenew cleansing data quality rule and store, in the rules repository,linking data that links the new profiling data quality rule to the newcleansing data quality rule. In these implementations, the data qualityjob management module may be configured to recognize that the newprofiling data quality rule is linked to the new cleansing data qualityrule based on the stored linking data that links the new profiling dataquality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule, control the dataquality processing system to execute the new profiling data quality ruleto identify errors in data records, and, based on the recognition thatthe new profiling data quality rule is linked to the new cleansing dataquality rule and without user input after controlling the data qualityprocessing system to execute the new profiling data quality rule,control the data quality processing system to execute the new cleansingdata quality rule on the data records identified as having errorsaccording to the new profiling data quality rule.

The rules management module may be configured to link profiling dataquality rules with cleansing data quality rules, organize profiling dataquality rules and cleansing data quality rules by industry, and store,in the rules repository, profiling data quality rules and cleansing dataquality rules organized by industry and with linking data that linksprofiling data quality rules with cleansing data quality rules. Therules management module may be configured to modify data quality rulesdata in the rules repository. For example, the rules management modulemay be configured to receive user input defining a search query for dataquality rules in the rules repository, perform a search for data qualityrules in the rules repository based on the search query, identify dataquality rules in the rules repository that match the search query basedon performance of the search, and present the identified data qualityrules with one or more controls for a user to select one of theidentified data quality rules. In this example, the rules managementmodule may be configured to receive user input selecting a data qualityrule from among the identified data quality rules, lock the selecteddata quality rule based on the selection, allow a change to the selecteddata quality rule based on locking the selected data quality rule, andprevent changes to data quality rules that are not locked.

The rules management module may be configured to receive user input todelete the selected data quality rule when the selected data qualityrule is locked and delete the selected data quality rule based on theuser input to delete the selected data quality rule received when theselected data quality rule is locked. The rules management module alsomay be configured to receive user input to modify one or more attributesof the selected data quality rule when the selected data quality rule islocked and modify the one or more attributes of the selected dataquality rule based on the user input to modify the one or moreattributes of the selected data quality rule received when the selecteddata quality rule is locked.

In some implementations, the data quality job management module may beconfigured to present data quality rules for selection organized byindustry, receive user input selecting data quality rules to migrate,and identify the data quality processing system to which the selecteddata quality rules are to be migrated. In these implementations, thedata quality job management module may be configured to transform theselected data quality rules and data quality rules linked to theselected data quality rules to a format suitable for the identified dataquality processing system, and send the transformed data quality rulesto the identified data quality processing system.

The data quality job management module may be configured to identify,from among multiple, different data quality processing systems and basedon user selection, the data quality processing system to which the dataquality rules are to be migrated. The data quality job management modulealso may be configured to determine a format suitable for the identifieddata quality processing system and transform the data quality rules tothe format suitable for the identified data quality processing system.

In some examples, the data quality job management module may beconfigured to allow the data quality processing system to access data tobe profiled and cleansed and control the data quality processing systemto execute the migrated data quality rules on the data to be profiledand cleansed. In these examples, the data quality job management modulemay be configured to monitor results of profiling and cleansingperformed by the data quality processing system on the data to beprofiled and cleansed and generate one or more reports that includeinformation descriptive of profiling and cleansing performed by the dataquality processing system based on the results of profiling andcleansing performed by the data quality processing system on the data tobe profiled and cleansed. Further, in these examples, the data qualityjob management module may be configured to output the one or moregenerated reports and provide a cleansed version of the data to beprofiled and cleansed.

The details of one or more implementations are set forth in theaccompanying drawings and the description, below. Other potentialfeatures of the disclosure will be apparent from the description anddrawings, and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1, 3, 16, and 24 are diagrams of exemplary systems.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of an exemplary rules repository.

FIGS. 4, 5, 8, 15, and 17A are flowcharts of exemplary processes.

FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 11-14, and 17B are diagrams illustrating exemplary userinterfaces.

FIG. 10 is a diagram of an exemplary data structure for data qualityrules.

FIGS. 17C-23 are diagrams illustrating exemplary data quality reports.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Techniques are described for providing data quality services that unitedata quality assets, processes, industry knowledge, and cleansingapproaches. The data quality services may leverage a data quality rulesmanagement repository aligned with the creation, update and applicationof data quality rules that are tailored by industry. The data qualityservices also may leverage a data quality monitoring solution thattracks the state of data, to assist with assessment of the effectivenessof cleansing approaches and to identify root cause data quality issues.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system 100 for data quality management.The system 100 includes a data quality rules acceleration module 110, arules management module 120, and a data quality job management module130. The data quality rules acceleration module 110, the rulesmanagement module 120, and the data quality job management module 130may be separate hardware components of the system 100 or may be part ofa single hardware component of the system 100. For instance, the dataquality rules acceleration module 110, the rules management module 120,and the data quality job management module 130 may be a combination ofhardware and software that operate on a single server system.

The system 100 also includes a rules repository 140 and a database 150.The rules repository 140 may be any type of data storage system that iscapable of storing data quality rules that are used in data qualityprocesses. The database 150 may be any type of database (or other datastorage system) that is capable of storing data to be profiled and/orcleansed.

The system 100 further includes multiple, different data qualityprocessing systems 160, 170, and 180. The multiple, different dataquality processing systems 160, 170, and 180 may be any type of dataquality processing system that is capable of performing profiling dataquality operations and/or cleansing data quality operations based ondata quality rules. The multiple, different data quality processingsystems 160, 170, and 180 may be separate from the data quality jobmanagement module 130 and may represent data quality processing systemsoffered by multiple, different vendors.

The rules repository 140 may store any type of data quality rule used inassessing and/or correcting data quality issues. For instance, the rulesrepository 140 may store profiling data quality rules and cleansing dataquality rules. Profiling data quality rules may include rules that flagand count data quality issues based on one or more conditions defined bythe rule. Cleansing data quality rules may include rules that flag andcorrect data quality issues based on one or more conditions defined bythe rule such that the corrected data now complies with the one or moreconditions defined by the rule.

Profiling and cleansing data quality rules may define many differenttypes of conditions that are used to perform data quality processing.For example, column data quality rules may check for conditions incolumns of data, such as whether the column data is in a proper formatand has a proper data type. Structure data quality rules may check forconditions related to structure of specific data entries, such aswhether a specific value is stored in a data entry. Business dataquality rules may check for conditions related to business rules, suchas whether a value stored in a data entry is within a range that isappropriate for operation of the business (e.g., whether oil viscositydata is greater than a particular value).

In some implementations, the rules repository 140 may store linking datathat links profiling data quality rules with cleansing data qualityrules (e.g., linked pairs of data quality rules that have a profilingdata quality rule linked to a cleansing data quality rule by the linkingdata). In these implementations, the linking data may link a profilingdata quality rule with one or more cleansing data quality rules. Forinstance, the rules repository 140 may include multiple linked pairs ofdata quality rules that have a profiling data quality rule linked to acleansing data quality rule by the linking data.

Based on the linking data, the profiling data quality rule may beexecuted in a coordinated manner with the one or more cleansing dataquality rules. For instance, the profiling data quality rule may beexecuted to identify potential errors in data and then the one or morecleansing data quality rules may be executed against the data withpotential errors in an attempt to correct the potential errors. Thelinking data may allow the one or more cleansing data quality rules tobe executed in an automated manner (e.g., without user input) after theprofiling data quality rule is executed and identifies potential errorsin the data. The coordinated execution may provide increased automationin the data quality process and allow for end-to-end tracking of dataprofiling and data cleansing operations.

In some examples, the rules repository 140 stores data quality rules ina generic format that is independent of any system that executes thedata quality rules. In these examples, the data quality rules are notstored in a vendor-specific format and need to be converted to avendor-specific format prior to actually being executed on a dataquality processing system provided by a vendor. Despite the additionalconversion needed to execute the data quality rules, storing the dataquality rules in a generic format may provide benefits because the dataquality rules may be migrated to any system. The ability to use the samerules on any system may offer flexibility in which one or more dataquality processing systems a company uses. Storing the data qualityrules in a generic format also may ease transition when the companydecides to change which data quality processing system the company usesbecause the data quality rules stored in the rules repository 140 areusable in the new data quality processing system after the properconversion.

Further, in some implementations, the rules repository 140 stores dataquality rules in a manner organized by industry. In theseimplementations, the data quality rules include data defining theconditions of the data quality rules and also include data defining towhich one or more industries the data quality rules are relevant. Thedata quality rules may be relevant to only one industry, a subset ofmultiple industries, or all industries. By organizing the data qualityrules by industry in the rules repository 140, members of a specificindustry may take advantage of past industry expertise and easily viewwhich data quality rules may be appropriate for their specific industry.Organization by vertical industry may be very helpful to quickly assesswhich data quality rules are beneficial to a company's business. Also,as industries change and new data quality rules are added (or existingdata quality rules are modified), the rules repository 140 may maintaina current set of rules appropriate for each industry and continue toleverage industry expertise in organizing rules in the rules repository140.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary rules repository 200. As shown, therules repository 200 stores data quality rules organized by industry.Although three industries are shown for brevity, data quality rules maybe organized by more (perhaps many more) industries.

In the example shown in FIG. 2, rules data for a first industry includesa generic profiling data quality rule, a first industry-specificprofiling data quality rule, a first industry-specific cleansing dataquality rule, and linking data that links the first industry-specificprofiling data quality rule with the first industry-specific cleansingdata quality rule. Although three data quality rules are shown forbrevity, the first industry may be associated with more (perhaps manymore) data quality rules.

Rules data for a second industry includes the generic profiling dataquality rule, a multi-industry cleansing data quality rule, a secondindustry-specific profiling data quality rule, a secondindustry-specific cleansing data quality rule, linking data that linksthe generic profiling data quality rule with the multi-industrycleansing data quality rule, and linking data that links the secondindustry-specific profiling data quality rule with the secondindustry-specific cleansing data quality rule. In this example, thegeneric profiling data quality rule is applicable to both the firstindustry and the second industry, but the multi-industry cleansing dataquality rule is not applicable to the first industry and, therefore, notorganized under the first industry. Also, although the generic profilingdata quality rule has been listed under the first industry and thesecond industry, the rules repository 200 may not redundantly store thegeneric profiling data quality rule and, instead, may reference a singlestored instance of the generic profiling data quality rule in both thefirst industry rules data and the second industry rules data. Further,although four data quality rules are shown for brevity, the secondindustry may be associated with more (perhaps many more) data qualityrules.

Rules data for an nth industry includes the generic profiling dataquality rule, the multi-industry cleansing data quality rule, an nthindustry-specific profiling data quality rule, an nth industry-specificcleansing data quality rule, and linking data that links the genericprofiling data quality rule with the multi-industry cleansing dataquality rule. In this example, the generic profiling data quality ruleis applicable to all of the first, second, and third industries, but themulti-industry cleansing data quality rule is applicable to the secondand third industries. Also, although the generic profiling data qualityrule and the multi-industry cleansing data quality rule have been listedunder multiple industries, the rules repository 200 may not redundantlystore the rules and, instead, may reference a single stored instance ofthe rules in the industry rules data. Further, although four dataquality rules are shown for brevity, the third industry may beassociated with more (perhaps many more) data quality rules.

Referring again to FIG. 1, the data quality rules acceleration module110 assists in determining which data quality rules are appropriate fora particular set of data to be profiled and/or cleansed. For example,the data quality rules acceleration module 110 accesses data to beprofiled and/or cleansed from the database 150 and analyzes the accesseddata in an attempt to infer which data quality rules are appropriate forassessing quality of the accessed data. In this example, the dataquality rules acceleration module 110 automatically, without userintervention, infers one or more data quality rules (e.g., profilingdata quality rules and cleansing data quality rules) based on theanalysis of the accessed data. The data quality rules accelerationmodule 110 may pass the inferred rules to the rules management module120 for suggestion to a user and/or storage in the rules repository 140.

The rules management module 120 assists in management of data qualityrules stored in the rules repository 140. For example, the rulesmanagement module 120 may present user interfaces that allow a user toprovide input in managing data quality rules that are stored in therules repository 140. In this example, the rules management module 120may receive user input to add new data quality rules to the rulesrepository 140, modify existing data quality rules stored in the rulesrepository 140, link profiling data quality rules with cleansing dataquality rules, and organize data quality rules by industry to allowusers to perceive data quality rules that are relevant for various,different industries.

The data quality job management module 130 receives data quality rulesfrom the rules management module 120 and migrates the received dataquality rules to one or more of the data quality processing systems 160,170, and 180. For instance, the data quality job management module 130converts data quality rules stored in the rules repository 140 in ageneric format to a vendor-specific format used by one or more of thedata quality processing systems 160, 170, and 180. The data quality jobmanagement module 130 also allows one or more of the data qualityprocessing systems 160, 170, and 180 to access data to be profiledand/or cleansed from the database 150 and controls one or more of thedata quality processing systems 160, 170, and 180 to execute themigrated data quality rules on the data to be profiled and/or cleansedfrom the database 150. The data quality job management module 130monitors execution of the migrated data quality rules on the data to beprofiled and/or cleansed from the database 150 and tracks informationrelated to the execution throughout data quality processing. The dataquality job management module 130 also may return cleansed data back tothe database 150 and may provide reports based on the monitoring of theexecution of the migrated data quality rules on the data to be profiledand/or cleansed from the database 150.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary data quality management system 300. Thesystem 300 includes an input module 310, a data store 320, one or moreprocessors 330, one or more I/O (Input/Output) devices 340, and memory350. The input module 320 may be used to input any type of informationused by data quality services performed by the system 300. For example,the input module 310 may be used to receive input defining parametersfor rule discovery, input defining new data quality rules, inputdefining modification of rules data stored in a rules repository, inputselecting data quality rules to migrate to a data quality processingsystem, and/or input related to monitoring and reporting results of dataquality operations. In some implementations, data from the input module310 is stored in the data store 320. The data included in the data store320 may include, for example, data quality rules and data to be profiledand/or cleansed.

In some examples, the data store 320 may be a relational database thatlogically organizes data into a series of database tables. Each databasetable in the data store 320 may arrange data in a series of columns(where each column represents an attribute of the data stored in thedatabase) and rows (where each row represents attribute values). In someimplementations, the data store 320 may be an object-oriented databasethat logically or physically organizes data into a series of objects.Each object may be associated with a series of attribute values. In someexamples, the data store 320 may be a type of database management systemthat is not necessarily a relational or object-oriented database. Forexample, a series of XML (Extensible Mark-up Language) files ordocuments may be used, where each XML file or document includesattributes and attribute values. Data included in the data store 320 maybe identified by a unique identifier such that data related to aparticular process may be retrieved from the data store 320.

The processor 330 may be a processor suitable for the execution of acomputer program such as a general or special purpose microprocessor,and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. In someimplementations, the system 300 includes more than one processor 330.The processor 330 may receive instructions and data from the memory 350.The memory 350 may store instructions and data corresponding to any orall of the components of the system 300. The memory 350 may includeread-only memory, random-access memory, or both.

The I/O devices 340 are configured to provide input to and output fromthe system 300. For example, the I/O devices 340 may include a mouse, akeyboard, a stylus, or any other device that allows the input of data.The I/O devices 340 may also include a display, a printer, or any otherdevice that outputs data.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process 400 for managing data quality processes.The operations of the process 400 are described generally as beingperformed by the system 300. In some implementations, operations of theprocess 400 may be performed by one or more processors included in oneor more electronic devices.

The system 300 infers data quality rules (410). For example, the system300 accesses data to be profiled and/or cleansed, accesses data definingdata quality rules in a repository, and analyzes the accessed data to beprofiled and/or cleansed with the data defining data quality rules. Inthis example, the system 300 attempts to infer which data quality rulesare appropriate for assessing quality of the accessed data to beprofiled and/or cleansed based on the analysis.

In some implementations, the analysis used to infer data quality rulesmay include statistical analysis of the data to be profiled and/orcleansed. In these implementations, the system 300 may analyze the datato be profiled and/or cleansed to identify statistical outliers in termsof data values, data format, or other attributes. The system 300identifies statistical outliers and determines whether the statisticaloutliers are indicators of data quality rules that are appropriate forthe data to be profiled and/or cleansed. The system 300 may consider therarity of the statistical outliers identified in the data and/or whetherthe statistical outliers identified in the data correspond to dataquality rules that are available in a rules repository. For example, thesystem 300 may determine that a field of a data structure has only onenegative value in one million records. In this example, the system 300may determine that a data quality rule that checks whether data in thefield of the data structure has a positive value is appropriate becausea negative value appears in the field of the data structure veryinfrequently (e.g., below a threshold level of frequency) and/or a dataquality rule that checks whether data is positive is available in therules repository.

In some examples, the analysis used to infer data quality rules mayinclude comparing attribute headings of the data to be profiled and/orcleansed with names and/or predefined data associated with data qualityrules stored in the rules repository. In these examples, the system 300may determine that a data quality rule is appropriate for a column ofdata in a database based on a comparison of a name for the column ofdata revealing that the name for the column of data matches (or issimilar to) a name for the data quality rule or that metadata for thedata quality rule indicates that the data quality rule is typicallyappropriate for columns of data that have the name for the column ofdata. For instance, the database may include a column named “gender” andthe system 300 may determine that a data quality rule that checkswhether values stored in the column include a value of “M,” “Male,” “F,”or “Female” because the data quality rule is named “gender test” dataquality rule (which matches the “gender” column name) or metadata forthe data quality rule indicates that the data quality rule is typicallyappropriate for columns of data that have “gender” in the name.

Further, the analysis used to infer data quality rules may includerunning data quality rules against the data to be profiled and/orcleansed and examining the results. For instance, the system 300 may runall data quality rules stored in a rules repository against the data tobe profiled and/or cleansed and determine a percentage of the dataidentified as having a potential error for each of the data qualityrules. The system 300 then may compare the determined percentages to oneor more thresholds that define typical or expected error rates anddetermine whether each rule is producing typical or expected error ratesfor the data to be profiled and/or cleansed. When the system 300determines that a rule is producing typical or expected error rates(e.g., relatively low, but not zero) based on the comparison, the system300 infers that the rule may be appropriate for the data to be profiledand/or cleansed. When the system 300 determines that a rule is producingatypical or unexpected error rates (e.g., relatively high error rate)based on the comparison, the system 300 infers that the rule may beinappropriate for the data to be profiled and/or cleansed.

The analysis used to infer data quality rules may include evaluation ofa combination of techniques discussed throughout this disclosure. Forinstance, the system 300 may compare attribute headings of the data tobe profiled and/or cleansed with names and/or predefined data associatedwith data quality rules stored in the rules repository. When the system300 finds a match based on the comparison, the system 300 may run thematching data quality rule against the data to be profiled and/orcleansed, evaluate the results, and only infer that the matching dataquality rule is appropriate when the system 300 determines that thematching data quality rule is producing typical or expected error rates.

FIG. 5 illustrates a process 500 for inferring data quality rules. Theprocess 500 may be used in inferring data quality rules referenced abovewith respect to reference numeral 410. The operations of the process 500are described generally as being performed by the system 300. In someimplementations, operations of the process 500 may be performed by oneor more processors included in one or more electronic devices.

The system 300 accesses data to be profiled and/or cleansed (510). Forexample, the system 300 retrieves data to be profiled and/or cleansedfor a database through one or more database queries. The system 300 alsomay access data from a file, such as a spreadsheet file or acomma-separated values file. The system 300 may determine which data toaccess based on input provided by a user.

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary user interface 600 that may be used indiscovering data quality rules. The system 300 may use the userinterface 600 to receive input identifying data to be profiled and/orcleansed and then access the identified data to be profiled and/orcleansed as discussed above with respect to reference numeral 510. Asshown, the user interface 600 includes an upload file button 610, adiscover rules button 620, and a browse rules button 630. The uploadfile button 610, when pressed, causes an additional interface to bedisplayed that allows a user to locate and upload a comma-separatedvalues file that includes data to be profiled and/or cleansed. Thediscover rules button 620, when pressed, causes the system 300 toinitiate a process to discover data quality rules that are appropriatefor the data included in the comma-separated values file uploaded usingthe upload file button 610. The browse rules button 630, when pressed,causes the system 300 to display data quality rules discovered throughthe discovery process initiated using the discover rules button 620.

Referring again to FIG. 5, the system 300 sets parameters for rulediscovery (520). For instance, the system 300 may set parameters thatdefine how rule discovery takes place in analyzing data to be profiledand/or cleansed. The parameters may relate to a level of confidence thesystem 300 must have in discovering a rule and preference for how rulesare discovered and/or what types of rules are discovered. The system 300may receive user input defining parameters for rule discovery and setthe parameters based on the receive user input. The system 300 may setparameters for each rule discovery process performed or may setparameters that are applied to multiple rule discovery processesperformed on multiple data files.

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary user interface 700 that may be used toreceive input defining parameters for rule discovery. The system 300 mayuse the user interface 700 to receive input defining parameters for rulediscovery and then set parameters for rule discovery as discussed abovewith respect to reference numeral 520. The system 300 may display theuser interface 700 in response to receiving user selection of thediscover rules button 620 in the user interface 600.

The user interface 700 includes a parameter name column 710, a rangecolumn 720, and input parameter value column 730. The parameter namecolumn 710 identifies the name of each parameter that may be set forrule discovery. The range column 720 identifies a range of permissiblevalues for each parameter that may be set for rule discovery. The inputparameter value column 730 provides an input control for each parameterthat may be set for rule discovery and that allows a user to provideuser input to set the corresponding parameter. Although the inputcontrols shown in the input parameter value column 730 are text boxinput controls that receive text input, other types of inputs controlsmay be used in the input parameter value column 730, such as radiobuttons, drop-down menus, etc.

As shown in the user interface 700, several parameters may be set forrule discovery. For instance, a Project Name parameter may be set. TheProject Name parameter has a range of any text and defines the name ofthe project to be created from the rules discovery process. A MaximumNumber of Rules parameter may be set. The Maximum Number of Rulesparameter has a range of zero to five thousand and defines the maximumnumber of rules that the system 300 will return as part of the rulesdiscovery process (e.g., an upper bound). In some implementations, thesystem 300 may determine whether the number of potential rulesdiscovered exceeds the Maximum Number of Rules parameter and, if so,select a number of rules that corresponds to the Maximum Number of Rulesparameter. The system 300 may select rules that have the highestconfidence of being appropriate and/or rules that have the highestpotential impact on data quality.

A Coverage parameter may be set. The Coverage parameter has a range ofzero to one hundred and defines the percentage of data that a rule mustcover in order for the system 300 to return the rule to the user. Lowercoverage will return more rules, but will require longer discovery time.

An Expected Error parameter may be set. The Expected Error parameter hasa range of zero to one hundred and defines the expected percentage oferror in the dataset. The system 300 may compare the Expected Errorparameter to a percentage of error computed for a particular dataquality rule and discover the particular data quality rule as beingappropriate when the comparison reveals that the computed percentage oferror is within a threshold of the Expected Error parameter.

An Interest parameter may be set. The Interest parameter has a range often to one hundred and defines the minimum level of interest for a rule(as determined by whether the occurrence of the rule is due to randomchance). Ten is the lowest level of interest and a rule must exceed thisthreshold in order for it to be returned.

A Maximum Number of Conditions parameter may be set. The Maximum Numberof Conditions parameter has a range of one to ten and defines themaximum number of conditions allowed on the left hand side of the rule.Rules having more conditions than the Maximum Number of Conditionsparameter are not considered as part of the rule discovery process.

A Maximum Number of Seeds parameter may be set. The Maximum Number ofSeeds parameter has a range of zero to one thousand and defines themaximum number of combinations of two attributes to consider. A largernumber will result in longer discovery time.

A Branch Limit parameter may be set. The Branch Limit parameter has arange of one to twenty and defines the maximum number of new rules togenerate from an existing rule if it needs to be refined during thediscovery process. A Record Block Size parameter may be set. The RecordBlock Size parameter has a range of five thousand to five hundredthousand and defines the maximum number of records to examine at a time.

A Column Strength parameter may be set. The Column Strength parameterhas a range of one to one hundred and defines the minimum strength(e.g., correlation) that must exist between in order for the system 300to consider them as a potential attribute pair from which to discoverrules. A lower strength will result in more potential attribute pairs.

A Stable Window parameter may be set. The Stable Window parameter has arange of one to fifty and defines the window size over which the system300 will determine whether any more rules can be discovered.

A Preference parameter may be set. The Preference parameter has a rangeof “Favor Recall,” “Balance,” and “Favor Precision.” “Favor Recall”causes the system 300 to focus on discovering rules that can detect thelargest number of defects (at the expense of precision). “FavorPrecision” causes the system 300 to focus on rules with higher precision(at the expense of recall). “Balance” causes the system 300 to pursue abalanced strategy during rules discovery.

Referring again to FIG. 5, the system 300 analyzes the accessed databased on the set parameters for rule discovery (530). For example, thesystem 300 analyzes the accessed data to be profiled and/or cleansedbased on the parameters set using the user interface 700. In thisexample, the system 300 analyzes the accessed data and the potentialdata quality rules to attempt to identify whether particular dataquality rules are appropriate to discover in accordance with thepreferences defined by the parameters set using the user interface 700.For instance, the system 300 may identify potential data quality rulesthat have a number of conditions that is less than or equal to theMaximum Number of Conditions parameter. The system 300 then may analyzethe accessed data to be profiled and/or cleansed to determine apercentage of coverage of each of the identified data quality rules andcompares the percentage of coverage to the Coverage parameter. Anycombination of the parameters set using the user interface 700 may beconsidered by the system 300 in performing rule discovery.

The system 300 discovers rules based on the analysis (540). Forinstance, the system 300 identifies a set of data quality rules thatmeet the parameters set using the user interface 700 and discovers theidentified set of data quality rules as being potentially appropriatefor the accessed data to be profiled and/or cleansed. In the exampledescribed above with respect to reference numeral 530, the system 300identifies a set of data quality rules that meet the Coverage parameterbased on the comparison of the percentage of coverage to the Coverageparameter. The system 300 then determines a number of data quality rulesincluded in the identified set of data quality rules, compares thenumber of data quality rules included in the identified set of dataquality rules to the Maximum Number of Rules parameter, and discoversthe identified set of data quality rules when the comparison revealsthat the number of data quality rules included in the identified set ofdata quality rules is less than or equal to the Maximum Number of Rulesparameter. When the comparison reveals that the number of data qualityrules included in the identified set of data quality rules is greaterthan the Maximum Number of Rules parameter, the system 300 limits theidentified set of data quality rules to the Maximum Number of Rulesbased on, for example, highest percentage of coverage. As mentionedabove, any combination of the parameters set using the user interface700 may be considered by the system 300 in performing rule discovery.

The system 300 outputs the discovered rules (550). For instance, thesystem 300 displays the discovered rules, stores the discovered rules inelectronic storage (e.g., the rules repository 140), sends thediscovered rules in an electronic communication (e.g., an electronicmail message), prints a copy of the discovered rules using a printingdevice, or performs any other output operation that allows a user toperceive the discovered rules and use the discovered rules in a laterdata quality processing operation. The system 300 may display thediscovered rules in response to receiving user selection of the browserules button 630 in the user interface 600.

Referring again to FIG. 4, the system 300 manages a rules repository(420). For instance, the system 300 controls storage of and managesprofiling data quality rules stored in the rules repository, cleansingdata quality rules stored in the rules repository, and linking datastored in the rules repository that links profiling data quality ruleswith cleansing data quality rules. The system 300 may manage theprofiling data quality rules, the cleansing data quality rules, and thelinking data based on user input received through one or more userinterfaces displayed by the system 300. The system 300 also may organizethe profiling data quality rules and the cleansing data quality rules byindustry to allow a user to select a particular industry and receive asubset of the profiling data quality rules and the cleansing dataquality rules that are relevant to the particular industry.

FIG. 8 illustrates a process 800 for managing a rules repository. Theprocess 800 may be used in managing a rules repository referenced abovewith respect to reference numeral 420. The operations of the process 800are described generally as being performed by the system 300. In someimplementations, operations of the process 800 may be performed by oneor more processors included in one or more electronic devices.

The system 300 accesses automatically inferred profiling and/orcleansing data quality rules (810). For instance, the system 300accesses profiling and/or cleansing data quality rules that wereinferred as discussed above with respect to reference numeral 410 and/orprofiling and/or cleansing data quality rules that were discovered aspart of the process 500 discussed above. The system 300 may access theautomatically inferred profiling and/or cleansing data quality rulesfrom electronic storage (e.g., a rules repository or temporary storage).

The system 300 receives input defining profiling and/or cleansing dataquality rules (820). For example, the system 300 displays a userinterface that allows a user to define a data quality rule and receivesuser input entered into the displayed user interface. In this example,the system 300 may receive user input defining a name of a data qualityrule, whether the data quality rule is a profiling or cleansing dataquality rule, conditions of the data quality rule, and any otherparameter that may be used in defining data quality rules.

FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary user interface 900 that may be used toreceive input defining profiling and/or cleansing rules. The system 300may use the user interface 900 to receive input defining profilingand/or cleansing data quality rules as discussed above with respect toreference numeral 820. As shown, the user interface 900 includes inputcontrols that allow a user to define a new data quality rule.

The user interface 900 includes a Rule Name text box which receives textinput that defines a name of the new data quality rule. The userinterface 900 also includes a Rule Type drop-down menu control thatreceives user input selecting whether the new data quality rule is aprofiling rule or a cleansing rule. The user interface 900 furtherincludes a DQ Rule Type drop-down menu control that receives user inputselecting whether the new data quality rule is a column rule, astructure rule, or a business rule.

In addition, the user interface 900 includes a Condition text box whichreceives text input that defines one or more conditions for the new dataquality rule. The user interface 900 also includes a New Value text boxwhich receives text input that defines one or more parameters forsetting a new value when the new data quality rule is a cleansing dataquality rule and data needs to be cleansed. The user interface 900further includes an In Source text box which receives text input thatdefines a source (e.g., database) for the new data quality rule.

The user interface 900 includes Null, Key, Created in IA, andTransferred check boxes. The Created in IA check box indicates whetherthe new data quality rule was created in another data quality managementand/or processing system. In this example, the Created in IA check boxindicates whether the new data quality rule was created in theInformation Analyzer product provided by IBM Corporation. InformationAnalyzer is one example of another data quality management and/orprocessing system in which new data quality rules may be created. Othertypes of data quality management and/or processing system may be used.

The Null, Key, and Transferred check boxes receive user input selectingwhether or not the new data quality rule is null, is key, and has beentransferred. The user interface 900 also includes a Formatting text boxwhich receives text input that defines information related to formattingfor the new data quality rule. The user interface 900 further includes aJoin Type text box which receives text input that defines informationrelated to join type for the new data quality rule.

The user interface 900 includes a Cancel button and a Save button. TheCancel button cancels the process of adding a new rule and ends theprocess of adding a new rule without adding a new rule to the rulesrepository. The Save button causes a new rule to be saved in the rulesrepository based on the input provided in the user interface 900.

Referring again to FIG. 8, the system 300 links profiling and cleansingdata quality rules (830). For example, the system 300 receives userinput selecting a cleansing data quality rule to link with a profilingdata quality rule. In this example, the system 300 links the selectedcleansing data quality rule with the profiling data quality rule. Thesystem 300 may receive user input defining many pairs of profiling andcleansing data quality rules to link together such that the system 300created many pairs of linked profiling and cleansing data quality rules.The system 300 also may link a single profiling data quality rule withmultiple cleansing data quality rules or may link multiple profilingdata quality rules with a single cleansing data quality rule.

The system 300 organizes data quality rules by industry (840). Forexample, the system 300 receives user input selecting an industry andprofiling and/or cleansing data quality rules that are appropriate forthe selected industry. In this example, the system 300 organizes theselected profiling and/or cleansing data quality rules within theselected industry. The system 300 may receive user input defining manyprofiling and cleansing data quality rules to organize within theselected industry and may organize data quality rules across many,different industries such that a user is able to perceive data qualityrules that are appropriate for an industry in which the user isinterested in assessing quality of data. The system 300 may organize asingle data quality rule within a single industry, within multiple,different industries, or within all industries.

The system 300 stores, in a rules repository, profiling and cleansingdata quality rules organized by industry and with linking data thatlinks profiling and cleansing data quality rules (850). For instance,the system 300 stores automatically inferred profiling and cleansingdata quality rules that were accessed and stores profiling and cleansingdata quality that were defined by input received by the system 300. Thesystem 300 may present the automatically inferred profiling andcleansing data quality rules to a user for selection and store onlythose automatically inferred profiling and cleansing data quality rulesselected by the user as being appropriate.

The system 300 also stores linking data that links profiling andcleansing data quality rules. For example, the system 300 stores linkingdata for profiling and cleansing data quality rules that were linkedbased on user input received by the system 300. In this example, thesystem 300 may store linking data that creates many linked pairs ofprofiling and cleansing data quality rules in the rule repository. Thesystem 300 may store linking data separate from the data quality rulesor as a parameter of each data quality rule that includes an identifierfor another data quality rule to which the data quality rule or a nullvalue if the data quality rule is not linked to another data qualityrule.

The system 300 further stores industry data that organizes profiling andcleansing data quality rules by industry. For example, the system 300stores industry data for profiling and cleansing data quality rulesbased on organization of profiling and cleansing data quality rulesdiscussed above with respect to reference numeral 840. In this example,the system 300 may store industry data that organizes profiling andcleansing data quality rules in the rule repository with respect tomany, different industries. The system 300 may store industry dataseparate from the data quality rules or as a parameter of each dataquality rule that indicates which one or more industries the dataquality rule is organized within.

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary data structure 1000 that may be used tostore profiling and/or cleansing rules. As shown, the data structure1000 includes an Identifier field 1005, an In_Source field 1010, aRule_Name field 1015, a Condition field 1020, a Rule_Type field 1025, anIsNull field 1030, an IsKey field 1035, a Formatting field 1040, aCreated_In_IA field 1045, a Transferred field 1050, an Industry field1055, a Link_Data field 1060, and a DQ_Rule_Type field 1065. TheIdentifier field 1005 stores data defining a unique identifier for thedata quality rule.

The In_Source field 1010 stores data defining a source (e.g., database)for the data quality rule. The Rule Name field 1015 stores data defininga name of the data quality rule. The Condition field 1020 stores datadefining one or more conditions for the data quality rule. The Rule_Typefield 1025 stores data defining whether the data quality rule is aprofiling rule or a cleansing rule.

The IsNull field 1030 stores data defining whether or not the dataquality rule is null. The IsKey field 1035 stores data defining whetheror not the data quality rule is key. The Formatting field 1040 storesdata defining information related to formatting for the data qualityrule.

The Created_In_IA field 1045 stores data defining whether or not thedata quality rule was created in another data quality management and/orprocessing system. The Transferred field 1050 stores data definingwhether or not the data quality rule has been transferred. TheDQ_Rule_Type field 1065 stores data defining whether the data qualityrule is a column rule, a structure rule, or a business rule.

The Industry field 1055 stores data defining one or more industries thedata quality rule is organized within. The Industry field 1055 may bequeried by the system 300 to generate a list of data quality rules areappropriate for a particular industry.

The Link_Data field 1060 stores linking data defining one or more otherdata quality rules to which the data quality rule is linked. TheLink_Data field 1060 may store an identifier of one or more other dataquality rules to which the data quality rule is linked. The system 300may reference the Link_Data field 1060 to determine whether a dataquality rule is linked to another data quality rule and, if so, whichother data quality rule.

Referring again to FIG. 8, the system 300 allows modification of rulesdata in the rules repository (860). For example, the system 300 allows auser to delete data quality rules, modify parameters of data qualityrules, change or add linking data for data quality rules, and changeindustry organization for data quality rules. In this example, thesystem 300 may display user interfaces that allow a user to provideinput modifying rules data in the rules repository and modify the rulesdata (e.g., profiling and cleansing data quality rules data, linkingdata, and industry data) based on user input received through the userinterfaces. The system 300 may allow users to modify any parametersassociated with the rules repository and the rules data stored in therules repository.

FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary user interface 1100 that may be used insearching for data quality rules. The system 300 may use the userinterface 1100 to receive input that allows modification of rules datain the rules repository as discussed above with respect to referencenumeral 860. As shown, the user interface 1100 includes a Rule Name textbox that receives user input defining a search query for data qualityrules in the rules repository. The search query in the Rule Name textbox may be used to search for data quality rules that have a namematching the search query.

The user interface 1100 also includes a Back button that cancels theprocess of searching for data quality rules and returns to a prior userinterface displayed in performing data quality rules management. Theuser interface 1100 further includes a Search button that causes thesystem 300 to perform a search for data quality rules in the rulesrepository based on the search query received in the Rule Name text box.The system 300 identifies data quality rules in the rules repositorythat match the search query based on performance of the search.

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary user interface 1200 that may be used todisplay search results when searching for data quality rules. The system300 may use the user interface 1200 to receive input that allowsmodification of rules data in the rules repository as discussed abovewith respect to reference numeral 860. As shown, the user interface 1200presents a list of data quality rules identified in a search performedbased on input received through the interface 1100. In this example, thelist includes four data quality rules that match the search queryreceived through the interface 1100. The user interface 1200 may includemore or fewer (perhaps none) matching data quality rules depending onresults of the search.

The user interface 1200 also includes selection radio buttons that allowa user to select one or more of the data quality rules included in thelist. The user interface 1200 further includes a Back button and a LockRule button. The Back button cancels the process of reviewing dataquality rules returned as search results and returns to the userinterface 1100. The Lock Rule button causes the system 300 to lock anyof the data quality rules included in the list of results that wereselected using the radio buttons. For example, the system 300 locks oneor more selected data quality rules based on the selection of the LockRule button. In this example, the system 300 allows changes to the oneor more locked data quality rule based on the locking and preventschanges to data quality rules that are not locked. The system 300 alsoprevents locked data quality rules from being used in a data qualityprocess because the locked data quality rules are possibly beingmodified. The system 300 further allows unlocked data quality rules tobe used in a data quality process because the unlocked data qualityrules are not being modified.

FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary user interface 1300 that may be used todisplay a selected and locked data quality rule. The user interface 1300may be displayed based on selection of the radio button associated withthe Rule Customer Name in the user interface 1200 and then selection ofthe Lock Rule button in the user interface 1200. The user interface 1300displays attributes of the locked data quality rule and includes anUnlock button that causes the system 300 to unlock the data quality ruleand return the user interface 1200. When the Unlock button is selected,the system 300 prevents changes to the unlocked data quality rule andallows the unlocked data quality rule to be used in a data qualityprocess.

The user interface 1300 also includes a Delete DQ Rule control and aModify DQ Rule control. The Delete DQ Rule control allows a user todelete the locked data quality rule. When the Delete DQ Rule control isselected, the system 300 deletes the locked data quality rule byremoving the locked data quality rule from the rules repository. Thesystem 300 may confirm that the user wishes to delete the locked dataquality rule prior to performing the deletion. The Modify DQ Rulecontrol causes the system 300 to display another user interface thatallows a user to modify attributes of the locked data quality rule.

FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary user interface 1400 that may be used toreceive input defining modifications to a data quality rule. The userinterface 1400 may be displayed based on selection of the Modify DQ Rulecontrol in the user interface 1300. As shown, the user interface 1400includes components that are similar to the components included in theuser interface 900. The system 300 displays the user interface 1400 withcurrent values for the locked data quality rule filled in and allows auser to modify any of the attributes of the locked data quality rule.The system 300 receives modifications to the locked data quality ruleand, when the Save button is selected, modifies attributes of the lockeddata quality in the rules repository based on the receivedmodifications.

Referring again to FIG. 4, the system 300 migrates data quality rules toone or more data quality processing systems (430). For instance, thesystem 300 migrates profiling data quality rules to one or more dataquality processing systems and migrates cleansing data quality rules toone or more data quality processing systems. The system 300 also maymigrate linked pairs of data quality rules that have a profiling dataquality rule linked to a cleansing data quality rule by linking data inthe rules repository.

In migrating data quality rules to one or more data quality processingsystems, the system 300 may transform a format of the data qualityrules. For example, the system 300 may store the data quality rules inthe rules repository in a generic format that is agnostic to the systemthat will execute the data quality rules. In this example, the system300 converts the data quality rules from the generic format to a formatused by the one or more data quality processing systems that willexecute the data quality rules. The system 300 may migrate the dataquality rules to a single data quality processing system or multiple,different data quality processing systems that use different formats.The system 300 may include configuration data that allows the system 300to convert the data quality rules from the generic format to a formatappropriate for the one or more data quality processing systems thatwill be executing the rules. After conversion, the system 300 sends theconverted data quality rules to the one or more data quality processingsystems for execution against data to be profiled and/or cleansed.

FIG. 15 illustrates a process 1500 for migrating data quality rules toone or more data quality processing systems. The process 1500 may beused in migrating data quality rules referenced above with respect toreference numeral 430. The operations of the process 1500 are describedgenerally as being performed by the system 300. In some implementations,operations of the process 1500 may be performed by one or moreprocessors included in one or more electronic devices.

The system 300 presents rules for selection organized by industry(1510). For example, the system 300 causes display of an interface thatshows rules stored in the rules repository in a manner that allows auser to perceive rules organized by industry. In this example, thesystem 300 may display the interface with industry headers and displaydata quality rules for each industry arranged in a list under theappropriate industry header. The industry headers may have controls thatallow a user to display and hide data quality rules arranged under theindustry headers.

The system 300 also may display a list of industries that may beselected by a user. When the system 300 receives selection of anindustry from the list, the system 300 displays the data quality rulesthat are organized within the selected industry. The system 300 mayperform additional organizing of data quality rules, such as organizingdata quality rules in sub-industries and/or by type (e.g., profilingdata quality rules, cleansing data quality rules, column data qualityrules, structure data quality rules, business data quality rules, etc.).By presenting rules for selection organized by industry, the system 300allows users to take advantage of past industry experience and industryexpertise that was used to organize the data quality rules by industryin the rules repository.

The system 300 receives selection of rules to migrate (1520). Forinstance, the system 300 receives user input selecting one or more dataquality rules to migrate to a data quality processing system. The userinput may include selection of individual data quality rules to migrateor selection of groups of data quality rules to migrate (e.g., userinput selecting all rules organized within a particular industry). Thesystem 300 may receive user input selecting profiling data quality rulesonly, cleansing data quality rules only, or a combination of profilingdata quality rules and cleansing data quality rules.

The system 300 identifies a data quality processing system to which theselected rules are to be migrated (1530). For example, the system 300accesses stored data that indicates one or more data quality processingsystems used by a user that selected the rules to migrate. In thisexample, the system 300 identifies one or more data quality processingsystems to which the selected rules are to be migrated based on theaccessed data. The system 300 also may access data that indicates one ormore data quality processing systems that are predefined to be used formigration of data quality rules and identify the one or more predefineddata quality processing systems.

In some implementations, the system 300 is able to connect to andmigrate data quality rules to multiple, different data qualityprocessing systems. In these implementations, the system 300 may presenta list of the multiple, different data quality processing systems thatare available and allow the user to select one or more of the multiple,different data quality processing systems that are available. In theseimplementations, the system 300 may identify a subset of the multiple,different data quality processing systems based on user selection input.For instance, when the system 300 receives user input selecting, fromamong the multiple, different data quality processing systems that areavailable, a particular data quality processing system, the system 300identifies the particular data quality processing system as the dataquality processing system to which the selected rules are to bemigrated.

The system 300 transforms the selected rules and rules linked to theselected rules to a format suitable for the identified data qualityprocessing system (1540). For instance, the selected data quality rulesmay be stored in a rules repository in a generic format. Accordingly,the selected data quality rules need to be transformed into a formatused by the one or more identified data quality processing systems forexecution.

To transform the selected data quality rules, the system 300 accessesconversion data that defines the format used by the one or moreidentified data quality processing systems and how to convert dataquality rules stored in the generic format to the format used by the oneor more identified data quality processing systems. The system 300 thenuses the accessed conversion data and transforms the selected dataquality rules into the appropriate format. When only a single dataquality processing system has been identified, the system 300 convertsthe selected data quality rules into the appropriate format for thesingle data quality processing system.

When multiple, different data quality processing systems have beenidentified, the system 300 converts portions of the selected dataquality rules into multiple, different formats used by the multiple,different data quality processing systems. For example, when the system300 identifies two data quality processing systems, the system 300 maytransform a first subset of the selected data quality rules into a firstformat used by a first data quality processing system and may transforma second subset of the selected data quality rules into a second formatused by a second data quality processing system. In this example, thefirst and second subsets may, in combination, include all of theselected data quality rules. In addition, some data quality rules mayoverlap the first subset and second subset depending on which dataquality rules were selected to be migrated to which one or both of thefirst and second data quality processing systems. In another example,when the system 300 identifies two data quality processing systems, thesystem 300 may transform all of the selected data quality rules into afirst format used by a first data quality processing system and maytransform all of the selected data quality rules into a second formatused by a second data quality processing system.

In addition to the selected data quality rules, the system 300 alsoconsiders data quality rules linked to the selected data quality rulesin performing migration. For instance, the system 300 may access linkingdata associated with the selected data quality rules and, based on thelinking data, determine whether any of the selected data quality rulesare linked to other data quality rules. In response to a determinationthat at least a portion of the selected data quality rules are linked toother data quality rules, the system 300 identifies, based on thelinking data, all data quality rules that are linked to one or more ofthe selected data quality rules and not included in the selected dataquality rules. The system 300 then accesses the linked data qualityrules and transforms, in addition to the selected data quality rules,the linked data quality rules into a format suitable for the identifiedone or more data quality processing systems. By transforming the linkeddata quality rules with the selected data quality rules withoutrequiring the user to identify the linked data quality rules, the system300 may enhance user convenience by ensuring all appropriate dataquality rules are transformed without requiring the user to take time inselecting the linked data quality rules. The system 300 may allow a userto select whether or not linked data quality rules should be migrated.The system also may present the linked data quality rules to the userand ask the user to confirm that the linked data quality rules should bemigrated with the selected data quality rules.

The system 300 sends the transformed data quality rules to theidentified data quality processing system (1550). For example, after thedata quality rules have been transformed into the appropriate format,the system 300 sends the transformed data quality rules to theidentified one or more data quality processing systems using one or moreelectronic communications. In this example, the system 300 mayestablish, over a network, a connection with the one or more dataquality processing systems and load the transformed data quality rulesto the identified one or more data quality processing systems over theestablished connection. Any type of electronic communication may be usedto send the transformed data quality rules to the identified one or moredata quality processing systems.

FIG. 16 illustrates an exemplary system 1600 in which rules are beingmigrated from a rules repository to data quality processing systems. Thesystem 1600 includes a rules repository 1610 and multiple, differentdata quality processing systems 1650, 1660, and 1670. The system 1600may be used in implementing the process 1500 discussed above withrespect to FIG. 15.

As shown, data quality rules 1620 are accessed from the rules repository1610. The data quality rules 1620 include data quality rules selected bya user and data quality rules linked to the selected data quality rulesby linking data stored in the rules repository 1610. The data qualityrules 1620 may be stored in a generic format (e.g., a format that is notused by any of the data quality processing systems 1650, 1660, and 1670)and may include both profiling data quality rules and cleansing dataquality rules. The data quality rules 1620 may be accessed from therules repository 1610 by a data quality management system as describedthroughout this disclosure.

After the data quality rules 1620 are accessed, the data quality rules1620 are divided into two subsets and transformed. For example, asshown, a first subset of data quality rules 1630 is being migrated to afirst data quality processing system 1650. In this example, data qualityrules included in the first subset of data quality rules 1630 aretransformed into a first format that is used by the first data qualityprocessing system 1650 and then sent to the first data qualityprocessing system 1650 after transformation. A second subset of dataquality rules 1640 is being migrated to a third data quality processingsystem 1670. Data quality rules included in the second subset of dataquality rules 1640 are transformed into a third format that is used bythe third data quality processing system 1670 and then sent to the thirddata quality processing system 1670 after transformation.

In the example shown in FIG. 16, some of the data quality rules 1620 aremigrated to the first data quality processing system 1650 and some ofthe data quality rules 1620 are migrated to the third data qualityprocessing system 1670. In this regard, each of the first data qualityprocessing system 1650 and the third data quality processing system 1670receive data quality rules in their respective formats and are able toexecute the received data quality rules against data to be profiledand/or cleansed. This configuration may allow relatively easy comparisontesting of data quality processing systems and also may allow forflexibility in which data quality processing systems are used by acompany and for which tasks. For instance, in the example shown in FIG.16, the first data quality processing system 1650 may be a system thatprofiles data (or a system that performs profiling relatively well, butcleansing relatively poorly) and the third data quality processingsystem 1670 may be a system that cleanses data (or a system thatperforms cleansing relatively well, but profiling relatively poorly).Accordingly, the first subset of data quality rules 1630 may beprofiling data quality rules that are migrated to the first data qualityprocessing system 1650 and the second subset of data quality rules 1640may be cleansing data quality rules that are migrated to the third dataquality processing system 1670.

Referring again to FIG. 4, the system 300 manages and monitors a dataquality process performed by the one or more data quality processingsystems using the migrated data quality rules (440). For instance, thesystem 300 manages a data quality process performed by the one or moredata quality processing systems using migrated profiling data qualityrules and migrated cleansing data quality rules. The system 300 maycontrol the one or more data quality processing systems execute themigrated data quality rules. The system 300 also monitors the dataquality process performed by the data quality processing system usingthe migrated data quality rules.

In some implementations, when the migrated data quality rules includeone or more linked pairs of data quality rules that have a profilingdata quality rule linked to a cleansing data quality rule, the system300 controls the one or more data quality processing systems to executethe one or more linked pairs of data quality rules in a coordinatedmanner. In these implementations, the system 300 recognizes that aprofiling data quality rule is linked to a cleansing data quality rulebased on stored linking data that links the profiling data quality ruleto the cleansing data quality rule. Based on the recognition, the system300 controls the data quality processing system to execute the profilingdata quality rule to identify errors in data records and, without userinput after controlling the data quality processing system to executethe profiling data quality rule, controls the data quality processingsystem to execute the cleansing data quality rule on the data recordsidentified as having errors according to the profiling data qualityrule. The system 300 may coordinate execution of linked profiling andcleansing data quality rules across multiple, different data qualityprocessing systems.

FIG. 17A illustrates a process 1700 for managing and monitoring a dataquality process. The process 1700 may be used in managing and monitoringa data quality process referenced above with respect to referencenumeral 440. The operations of the process 1700 are described generallyas being performed by the system 300. In some implementations,operations of the process 1700 may be performed by one or moreprocessors included in one or more electronic devices.

The system 300 allows a data quality processing system to access data tobe profiled and/or cleansed (1710). For example, the system 300 mayprovide the data quality processing system with information about a datasource that allows the data quality processing system to access the datato be profiled and/or cleansed. In this example, the system 300 mayprovide the data quality processing system with information identifyingthe data source (e.g., a name and network address of a database system),a location of the data to be profiled and/or cleansed within the datasource (e.g., one or more database table names within the data source ora query that may be used to extract the data from the data source), andaccess information that provides access to the data source (e.g.,credentials, such as a password, needed to access the data source). Thesystem 300 also may access the data to be profiled and/or cleanseditself and send the data to be profiled and/or cleansed to the dataquality processing system.

In some implementations, the system 300 may allow data qualityprocessing by creating a job in an execution workflow engine included inthe system 300. In these implementations, the system 300 may add a newjob to the workflow, set dependencies for parent and child jobs, andcontrol the execution workflow engine to handle the processing. Anexecution workflow engine and techniques for controlling the executionworkflow engine are described in co-pending application Ser. No.12/057,958, titled “System And Method For Automating ETL Applications,”which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Thetechniques described in application Ser. No. 12/057,958 may be used toallow a data quality processing system to access data to be profiledand/or cleansed.

The system 300 controls the data quality processing system to executemigrated data quality rules including coordinated execution of linkedprofiling and cleansing rules (1720). For example, the system 300 sendsinstructions to the data quality processing system to run the migrateddata quality rules against the data to be profiled and/or cleansed. Thesystem 300 also coordinates execution of linked profiling and cleansingrules by controlling the data quality processing system to execute theprofiling data quality rule first and then controlling the data qualityprocessing system to execute the cleansing data quality rule. The system300 also may determine whether execution of the linked cleansing dataquality rule is even necessary based on results of the linked profilingdata quality rule (e.g., execute linked cleansing data quality rule onlywhen execution of the linked profiling data quality rule identifies morethan a threshold number of errors in the data to be profiled and/orcleansed. The system 300 may coordinate execution of linked profilingand cleansing data quality rules across multiple, different data qualityprocessing systems.

In some examples, the system 300 may use a number of prebuilt reportsfor monitoring data quality processing and data quality results. Inthese examples, the system 300 may generate, based on results of dataquality processing, the prebuilt reports within predefined parametersfor data to include in the prebuilt reports. FIG. 17B illustrates anexample user interface 1701 that displays available prebuilt reports andallows a user to select one or more prebuilt reports to be generated bythe system 300. As shown, the prebuilt reports may include a job listreport, a job link history per job report, a job link per sessionidentifier report, an error history report, a job history report, a realtime monitoring report, a session history report, a subject area historyreport, a subject area key performance indicator per session identifierreport, and a subject area key performance indicator per area report.FIG. 17C illustrates an example real time monitoring report 1702. Thereal time monitoring report 1702 shows real time information related toexecution of data quality processing jobs. For instance, as shown, thereal time monitoring report 1702 includes, for each job, a job name, asession identifier, a start date, an end date, a number of timesexecuted, a status of the last run, a total number of row reads, a totalnumber of row writes, a total number of row errors, a source name, atarget name, and an end state.

The system 300 monitors results of profiling and/or cleansing performedby the data quality processing system (1730). For instance, the system300 tracks which profiling data quality rules have been executed andwhich cleansing data quality rules have been executed.

For profiling data quality rules, the system 300 tracks, for eachprofiling data quality rule, a number of times the profiling dataquality rule has been applied with an acceptable result (e.g., no error)and a number of times the profiling data quality rule has been appliedwith an unacceptable result (e.g., error found). The system 300 alsotracks, for each profiling data quality rule, which data records havereceived an acceptable result and which data records have received anunacceptable result.

For cleansing data quality rules, the system 300 tracks, for eachcleansing data quality rule, a number of times the cleansing dataquality rule has been applied where cleansing was unnecessary and anumber of times the cleansing data quality rule has been applied wherecleansing was necessary. The system 300 also tracks, for each cleansingdata quality rule, which data records have been cleansed and which datarecords have not been cleansed.

By monitoring both profiling and cleansing operations, the system 300tracks early stages of data profiling with later stages of datacleansing. The system 300 monitors all steps of data quality processingto provide an end-to-end view of data quality assessment. In thisregard, the system 300 is able to tie early stage profiling operationstogether with later stage cleansing operations to provide a holisticview of data quality.

The system 300 generates reports based on the results of profilingand/or cleansing performed by the data quality processing system (1740).For example, the system 300 generates reports based on the tracked datamonitored from results of profiling and/or cleansing performed by thedata quality processing system. In this example, the system 300 maygenerate reports that include any combination of the tracked datadescribed throughout this disclosure and may generate reports that linkprofiling operations with cleansing operations (or at least include datarelated to profiling operations and data related to cleansingoperations). The system 300 may generate reports that include datadescriptive of which profiling data quality rules have been executed,which cleansing data quality rules have been executed, a number of timesprofiling data quality rules have been applied with an acceptableresult, a number of times profiling data quality rules have been appliedwith an unacceptable result, which data records have received anacceptable result from profiling, which data records have received anunacceptable result from profiling, a number of times cleansing dataquality rules have been applied where cleansing was unnecessary, anumber of times cleansing data quality rules have been applied wherecleansing was necessary, which data records have been cleansed, and/orwhich data records have not been cleansed. The system 300 may generateany of the reports shown in FIGS. 18-23.

By integrating both profiling and cleansing data in the generatedreports, the system 300 is able to provide report information for allsteps of data quality processing to provide an end-to-end view of dataquality assessment. In this regard, the system 300 report on early stageprofiling operations together with later stage cleansing operations toprovide a holistic view of data quality.

The system 300 outputs the generated reports and, when the data qualityprocessing system is controlled to perform cleansing operations,provides cleansed data (1750). For instance, the system 300 displays thegenerated reports, stores the generated reports in electronic storage,sends the generated reports in an electronic communication (e.g., anelectronic mail message), prints a copy of the generated reports using aprinting device, or performs any other output operation that allows auser to perceive the generated reports. The system 300 may output any ofthe reports shown in FIGS. 18-23.

When the data quality processing system is controlled to performcleansing operations, the system 300 provides cleansed data such thatthe cleansed data may be used to replace the accessed data prior tocleansing. For instance, the system 300 may send the cleansed data to adatabase system for handling or may store the cleansed data in adatabase table that is accessible to the user that initiated thecleansing. The database table may be a new database table created tostore the cleansed data or may be an old database table that isoverwritten with the cleansed data.

FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary rules report 1800 that may be generatedand output. The rules report 1800 shows information about all the rulesapplied during profiling and/or cleansing data quality processes. Forexample, for each rule applied, the rules report 1800 lists thecondition defined by the rule, the rule type (e.g., profiling orcleansing), the data quality rule type (e.g., column, structure, orbusiness), how many records the rule has been applied to with anacceptable result (e.g., passes the condition defined by the rule), andhow many records the rule has been applied to with an unacceptableresult (e.g., does not pass the condition defined by the rule). Thesystem may generate the rules report 1800 for the most recent executionor for a combination of past executions of data quality processes.

FIG. 19 illustrates an exemplary profiling analysis report 1900 that maybe generated and output. The profiling analysis report 1900 showsinformation about two concepts including profiling number and profilinganalysis. The profiling number is the total number of records and howmany records any profiling rule has been applied to with an unacceptableresult (e.g., does not pass the condition defined by the rule). Theprofiling analysis is the number of times that a profiling rule has beenapplied with an acceptable result (e.g., passes the condition defined bythe rule) and the number of times that a profiling rule has been appliedwith an unacceptable result (e.g., does not pass the condition definedby the rule). The system may generate the profiling analysis report 1900for the most recent execution or for a combination of past executions ofdata quality processes.

FIG. 20 illustrates an exemplary cleansing analysis report 2000 that maybe generated and output. The cleansing analysis report 2000 showsinformation about two concepts including cleansing number and cleansinganalysis. The cleansing number is the total number of records and howmany records any cleansing rule has been applied where it was necessaryto perform cleansing. The cleansing analysis is the number of times thata cleansing rule has been applied where it was necessary to performcleansing and the number of times that a cleansing rule has been appliedwhere it was unnecessary to perform cleansing. The system may generatethe cleansing analysis report 2000 for the most recent execution or fora combination of past executions of data quality processes.

FIG. 21 illustrates an exemplary profiling input report 2100 that may begenerated and output. The profiling input report 2100 shows informationabout all records each rule has been applied to with an unacceptableresult (e.g., does not pass the condition defined by the rule). For eachrecord with an unacceptable result, the profiling input report 2100shows the rule applied, the condition, and the data quality rule type(e.g., column, structure, or business). The system may generate theprofiling input report 2100 for the most recent execution or for acombination of past executions of data quality processes.

FIG. 22 illustrates an exemplary cleansing input report 2200 that may begenerated and output. The cleansing input report 2200 shows informationabout all records each rule has been applied to where cleansing wasperformed. For each record where cleansing was performed, the cleansinginput report 2200 shows the rule applied, the condition, and the dataquality rule type (e.g., column, structure, or business). The system maygenerate the cleansing input report 2200 for the most recent executionor for a combination of past executions of data quality processes.

FIG. 23 illustrates an exemplary last execution results report 2300 thatmay be generated and output. The last execution results report 2300shows information about records analyzed in the five most recentexecutions. For each execution, the last execution results report 2300shows the total number of records analyzed, how many records had anerror based on profiling analysis, and how many records needed cleansingbased on cleansing analysis.

FIG. 24 is a schematic diagram of an example of a generic computersystem 2400. The system 2400 can be used for the operations described inassociation with the processes 400, 500, 800, 1500, and 1700, accordingto some implementations. The system 2400 may be included in the systems100, 300, and 1600.

The system 2400 includes a processor 2410, a memory 2420, a storagedevice 2430, and an input/output device 2440. Each of the components2410, 2420, 2430, and 2440 are interconnected using a system bus 2450.The processor 2410 is capable of processing instructions for executionwithin the system 2400. In one implementation, the processor 2410 is asingle-threaded processor. In another implementation, the processor 2410is a multi-threaded processor. The processor 2410 is capable ofprocessing instructions stored in the memory 2420 or on the storagedevice 2430 to display graphical information for a user interface on theinput/output device 2440.

The memory 2420 stores information within the system 2400. In oneimplementation, the memory 2420 is a computer-readable medium. In oneimplementation, the memory 2420 is a volatile memory unit. In anotherimplementation, the memory 2420 is a non-volatile memory unit. Theprocessor 2410 and the memory 2420 may perform data manipulation andvalidation, including execution of data quality jobs.

The storage device 2430 is capable of providing mass storage for thesystem 2400. In one implementation, the storage device 2430 is acomputer-readable medium. In various different implementations, thestorage device 2430 may be a floppy disk device, a hard disk device, anoptical disk device, or a tape device. The storage device 2430 may storemonitoring data collected and data quality rule representations.

The input/output device 2440 provides input/output operations for thesystem 2400. In one implementation, the input/output device 2440includes a keyboard and/or pointing device. In another implementation,the input/output device 2440 includes a display unit for displayinggraphical user interfaces. The input/output device 2440 may be used toperform data exchange with source and target data quality managementand/or processing systems.

The features described can be implemented in digital electroniccircuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or incombinations of them. The apparatus can be implemented in a computerprogram product tangibly embodied in an information carrier, e.g., in amachine-readable storage device, for execution by a programmableprocessor; and method steps can be performed by a programmable processorexecuting a program of instructions to perform functions of thedescribed implementations by operating on input data and generatingoutput. The described features can be implemented advantageously in oneor more computer programs that are executable on a programmable systemincluding at least one programmable processor coupled to receive dataand instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a datastorage system, at least one input device, and at least one outputdevice. A computer program is a set of instructions that can be used,directly or indirectly, in a computer to perform a certain activity orbring about a certain result. A computer program can be written in anyform of programming language, including compiled or interpretedlanguages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as astand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unitsuitable for use in a computing environment.

Suitable processors for the execution of a program of instructionsinclude, by way of example, both general and special purposemicroprocessors, and the sole processor or one of multiple processors ofany kind of computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructionsand data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. Theelements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions andone or more memories for storing instructions and data. Generally, acomputer will also include, or be operatively coupled to communicatewith, one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; suchdevices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks andremovable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks. Storagedevices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructionsand data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way ofexample semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flashmemory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removabledisks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. Theprocessor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in,ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).

To provide for interaction with a user, the features can be implementedon a computer having a display device such as a CRT (cathode ray tube)or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor for displaying information tothe user and a keyboard and a pointing device such as a mouse or atrackball by which the user can provide input to the computer.

The features can be implemented in a computer system that includes aback-end component, such as a data server, or that includes a middlewarecomponent, such as an application server or an Internet server, or thatincludes a front-end component, such as a client computer having agraphical user interface or an Internet browser, or any combination ofthem. The components of the system can be connected by any form ormedium of digital data communication such as a communication network.Examples of communication networks include, e.g., a LAN, a WAN, and thecomputers and networks forming the Internet.

The computer system can include clients and servers. A client and serverare generally remote from each other and typically interact through anetwork, such as the described one. The relationship of client andserver arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it willbe understood that various modifications may be made without departingfrom the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, otherimplementations are within the scope of the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A data quality management system comprising: arules repository configured to store profiling data quality rules,cleansing data quality rules, and linking data that links profiling dataquality rules to cleansing data quality rules, the linking data defininga particular cleansing data quality rule to be automatically executed ondata after identification of at least one potential error in the datauncovered during execution of a corresponding particular profiling dataquality rule on the data; a rules management module configured to managethe rules repository by managing the profiling data quality rules storedin the rules repository, managing the cleansing data quality rulesstored in the rules repository, and managing the linking data stored inthe rules repository; and a data quality job management moduleconfigured to migrate data quality rules from the rules repository to adata quality processing system and manage a data quality processperformed by the data quality processing system using the migrated dataquality rules, the migrated data quality rules including one or morelinked pairs of data quality rules that each have a profiling dataquality rule linked to a cleansing data quality rule by the linkingdata, the one or more linked pairs of data quality rules including apair with the particular profiling data quality rule and the particularcleansing data quality rule, and the data quality job management modulebeing configured to control the data quality processing system toexecute the particular profiling data quality rule on particular dataand, in response to determining that the particular data includes atleast one potential error during the execution of the particularprofiling data quality rule, execute the particular cleansing dataquality rule on the particular data.
 2. The data quality managementsystem of claim 1, wherein the rules repository is configured to storethe profiling data quality rules, the cleansing data quality rules, andthe linking data in a generic format that is not specific to anyparticular data quality processing system.
 3. The data qualitymanagement system of claim 1, wherein the rules management module isconfigured to manage the profiling data quality rules stored in therules repository by accessing profiling and cleansing data quality rulesinferred from an analysis of data to be profiled or cleansed and storingthe inferred profiling and cleansing data quality rules in the rulesrepository.
 4. The data quality management system of claim 3, whereinthe rules management module is configured to generate the inferredprofiling and cleansing data quality rules by accessing the data to beprofiled or cleansed, analyzing the accessed data to be profiled orcleansed in an attempt to infer which profiling and cleansing dataquality rules are appropriate for assessing quality of the accessed datato be profiled or cleansed, and automatically, without userintervention, inferring one or more profiling and cleansing data qualityrules that are appropriate based on the analysis of the accessed data tobe profiled or cleansed.
 5. The data quality management system of claim1, wherein the rules management module is configured to receive userinput defining a new profiling data quality rule and a new cleansingdata quality rule and store the new profiling data quality rule and thenew cleansing data quality rule in the rules repository.
 6. The dataquality management system of claim 5: wherein the rules managementmodule is configured to receive user input linking the new profilingdata quality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule and store, inthe rules repository, linking data that links the new profiling dataquality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule; and wherein thedata quality job management module is configured to recognize that thenew profiling data quality rule is linked to the new cleansing dataquality rule based on the stored linking data that links the newprofiling data quality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule,control the data quality processing system to execute the new profilingdata quality rule to identify errors in data records, and, based on therecognition that the new profiling data quality rule is linked to thenew cleansing data quality rule and without user input after controllingthe data quality processing system to execute the new profiling dataquality rule, control the data quality processing system to execute thenew cleansing data quality rule on the data records identified as havingerrors according to the new profiling data quality rule.
 7. The dataquality management system of claim 1, wherein the rules managementmodule is configured to link profiling data quality rules with cleansingdata quality rules, organize profiling data quality rules and cleansingdata quality rules by industry, and store, in the rules repository,profiling data quality rules and cleansing data quality rules organizedby industry and with linking data that links profiling data qualityrules with cleansing data quality rules.
 8. The data quality managementsystem of claim 1, wherein the rules management module is configured tomodify data quality rules data in the rules repository.
 9. The dataquality management system of claim 1, wherein the data quality jobmanagement module is configured to automatically, without user input,control the data quality processing system to execute the particularcleansing data quality rule on the particular data in response todetermining that the particular data includes at least one potentialerror during the execution of the particular profiling data qualityrule.
 10. The data quality management system of claim 1, wherein thelinking data for the particular profiling data quality rule and theparticular cleansing data quality rule comprises an identifier for theparticular cleansing data quality rule and an identifier for theparticular profiling data quality rule.
 11. The data quality managementsystem of claim 1, wherein the data quality job management module isconfigured to monitor the data quality process performed by the dataquality processing system using the migrated data quality rules.
 12. Thedata quality management system of claim 1, wherein the data quality jobmanagement module is configured to monitor an entire operation of thedata quality process performed by the data quality processing systemincluding monitoring results of data profiling performed by the dataquality processing system and monitoring results of data cleansingperformed by the data quality processing system.
 13. The data qualitymanagement system of claim 1, wherein the data quality job managementmodule is configured to control the data quality processing system toexecute the one or more linked pairs of data quality rules in acoordinated manner.
 14. The data quality management system of claim 1,wherein the data quality job management module is configured to presentdata quality rules for selection organized by industry, receive userinput selecting data quality rules to migrate, identify the data qualityprocessing system to which the selected data quality rules are to bemigrated, transform the selected data quality rules and data qualityrules linked to the selected data quality rules to a format suitable forthe identified data quality processing system, and send the transformeddata quality rules to the identified data quality processing system. 15.The data quality management system of claim 14, wherein the data qualitymanagement module is configured to determine all other data qualityrules that are linked to the selected data quality rules and notincluded in the selected data quality rules, transform the other dataquality rules to the format suitable for the identified data qualityprocessing system, and send the transformed other data quality rules tothe identified data quality processing system.
 16. The data qualitymanagement system of claim 1, wherein the data quality job managementmodule is configured to identify, from among multiple, different dataquality processing systems and based on user selection, the data qualityprocessing system to which the data quality rules are to be migrated,determine a format suitable for the identified data quality processingsystem, and transform the data quality rules to the format suitable forthe identified data quality processing system.
 17. The data qualitymanagement system of claim 1, wherein the data quality job managementmodule is configured to allow the data quality processing system toaccess data to be profiled and cleansed and control the data qualityprocessing system to execute the migrated data quality rules on the datato be profiled and cleansed.
 18. The data quality management system ofclaim 17, wherein the data quality job management module is configuredto monitor results of profiling and cleansing performed by the dataquality processing system on the data to be profiled and cleansed,generate one or more reports that include information descriptive ofprofiling and cleansing performed by the data quality processing systembased on the results of profiling and cleansing performed by the dataquality processing system on the data to be profiled and cleansed,output the one or more generated reports, and provide a cleansed versionof the data to be profiled and cleansed.
 19. The data quality managementsystem of claim 1, wherein: the rules repository is configured to storeparticular linking data that links a particular profiling data qualityrule to two or more particular cleansing data quality rules, the linkingdata defining the two or more particular cleansing data quality rules tobe automatically executed on data after identification of at least onepotential error in the data uncovered during execution of the particularprofiling data quality rule on the data; and the data quality jobmanagement module is configured to control the data quality processingsystem to execute the particular profiling data quality rule onparticular data and, in response to determining that the particular dataincludes at least one potential error during the execution of theparticular profiling data quality rule, execute the two or moreparticular cleansing data quality rule on the particular data.
 20. Amethod comprising: storing, in a rules repository, profiling dataquality rules, cleansing data quality rules, and linking data that linksprofiling data quality rules to cleansing data quality rules, thelinking data defining a particular cleansing data quality rule to beautomatically executed on data after identification of at least onepotential error in the data uncovered during execution of acorresponding particular profiling data quality rule on the data;managing the rules repository by managing the profiling data qualityrules stored in the rules repository, managing the cleansing dataquality rules stored in the rules repository, and managing the linkingdata stored in the rules repository; migrating data quality rules fromthe rules repository to a data quality processing system, the migrateddata quality rules including one or more linked pairs of data qualityrules that each have a profiling data quality rule linked to a cleansingdata quality rule by the linking data, the one or more linked pairs ofdata quality rules including a pair with the particular profiling dataquality rule and the particular cleansing data quality rule; andmanaging a data quality process performed by the data quality processingsystem using the migrated data quality rules, the managing includingcontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularprofiling data quality rule on particular data and, in response todetermining that the particular data includes at least one potentialerror during the execution of the particular profiling data qualityrule, execute the particular cleansing data quality rule on theparticular data.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein storing, in a rulesrepository, profiling data quality rules, cleansing data quality rules,and linking data that links profiling data quality rules to cleansingdata quality rules comprises storing the profiling data quality rules,the cleansing data quality rules, and the linking data in a genericformat that is not specific to any particular data quality processingsystem.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein managing the profiling dataquality rules stored in the rules repository, managing the cleansingdata quality rules stored in the rules repository, and managing thelinking data stored in the rules repository comprises managing theprofiling data quality rules stored in the rules repository by accessingprofiling and cleansing data quality rules inferred from an analysis ofdata to be profiled or cleansed and storing the inferred profiling andcleansing data quality rules in the rules repository.
 23. The method ofclaim 22, comprising: generating the inferred profiling and cleansingdata quality rules by accessing the data to be profiled or cleansed,analyzing the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed in an attempt toinfer which profiling and cleansing data quality rules are appropriatefor assessing quality of the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed,and automatically, without user intervention, inferring one or moreprofiling and cleansing data quality rules that are appropriate based onthe analysis of the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed.
 24. Themethod of claim 20, comprising: receiving, by a rules management module,user input defining a new profiling data quality rule and a newcleansing data quality rule; and storing the new profiling data qualityrule and the new cleansing data quality rule in the rules repository.25. The method of claim 24, comprising: receiving, by the rulesmanagement module, user input linking the new profiling data qualityrule to the new cleansing data quality rule; and storing, by the rulesmanagement module in the rules repository, linking data that links thenew profiling data quality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule;recognizing, by a data quality job management module, that the newprofiling data quality rule is linked to the new cleansing data qualityrule based on the stored linking data that links the new profiling dataquality rule to the new cleansing data quality rule; controlling, by thedata quality job management module, the data quality processing systemto execute the new profiling data quality rule to identify errors indata records; and based on the recognition that the new profiling dataquality rule is linked to the new cleansing data quality rule andwithout user input after controlling the data quality processing systemto execute the new profiling data quality rule, controlling, by the dataquality job management module, the data quality processing system toexecute the new cleansing data quality rule on the data recordsidentified as having errors according to the new profiling data qualityrule.
 26. The method of claim 20, comprising: linking, by a rulesmanagement module, profiling data quality rules with cleansing dataquality rules; organizing, by the rules management module, profilingdata quality rules and cleansing data quality rules by industry; andstoring, by the rules management module in the rules repository,profiling data quality rules and cleansing data quality rules organizedby industry and with linking data that links profiling data qualityrules with cleansing data quality rules.
 27. The method of claim 20,comprising modifying, by a rules management module, data quality rulesdata in the rules repository.
 28. The method of claim 20, whereincontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularcleansing data quality rule on the particular data comprisesautomatically, without user input, controlling the data qualityprocessing system to execute the particular cleansing data quality ruleon the particular data in response to determining that the particulardata includes at least one potential error during the execution of theparticular profiling data quality rule.
 29. The method of claim 20,wherein the linking data for the particular profiling data quality ruleand the particular cleansing data quality rule comprises an identifierfor the particular cleansing data quality rule and an identifier for theparticular profiling data quality rule.
 30. The method of claim 20,comprising monitoring, by a data quality job management module, the dataquality process performed by the data quality processing system usingthe migrated data quality rules.
 31. The method of claim 20, comprisingmonitoring, by a data quality job management module, an entire operationof the data quality process performed by the data quality processingsystem including monitoring results of data profiling performed by thedata quality processing system and monitoring results of data cleansingperformed by the data quality processing system.
 32. The method of claim20, wherein controlling the data quality processing system to executethe particular profiling data quality rule on particular data comprisescontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the one ormore linked pairs of data quality rules in a coordinated manner.
 33. Themethod of claim 20, comprising: presenting, by a data quality jobmanagement module, data quality rules for selection organized byindustry; receiving, by the data quality job management module, userinput selecting data quality rules to migrate; identifying, by the dataquality job management module, the data quality processing system towhich the selected data quality rules are to be migrated; transforming,by the data quality job management module, the selected data qualityrules and data quality rules linked to the selected data quality rulesto a format suitable for the identified data quality processing system;and sending, by the data quality job management module, the transformeddata quality rules to the identified data quality processing system. 34.The method of claim 33, comprising: determining, by the data quality jobmanagement module, all other data quality rules that are linked to theselected data quality rules and not included in the selected dataquality rules; transforming, by the data quality job management module,the other data quality rules to the format suitable for the identifieddata quality processing system; and sending, by the data quality jobmanagement module, the transformed other data quality rules to theidentified data quality processing system.
 35. The method of claim 20,comprising: identifying, from among multiple, different data qualityprocessing systems and based on user selection, the data qualityprocessing system to which the data quality rules are to be migrated;determining a format suitable for the identified data quality processingsystem; and transforming the data quality rules to the format suitablefor the identified data quality processing system.
 36. The method ofclaim 20, comprising: allowing the data quality processing system toaccess data to be profiled and cleansed; and controlling the dataquality processing system to execute the migrated data quality rules onthe data to be profiled and cleansed.
 37. The method of claim 36,comprising: monitoring, by a data quality job management module, resultsof profiling and cleansing performed by the data quality processingsystem on the data to be profiled and cleansed; generating, by the dataquality job management module, one or more reports that includeinformation descriptive of profiling and cleansing performed by the dataquality processing system based on the results of profiling andcleansing performed by the data quality processing system on the data tobe profiled and cleansed; outputting, by the data quality job managementmodule, the one or more generated reports; and providing, by the dataquality job management module, a cleansed version of the data to beprofiled and cleansed.
 38. The method of claim 20, wherein: storing, ina rules repository, profiling data quality rules, cleansing data qualityrules, and linking data that links profiling data quality rules tocleansing data quality rules comprises storing, in the rules repository,particular linking data that links a particular profiling data qualityrule to two or more particular cleansing data quality rules, the linkingdata defining the two or more particular cleansing data quality rules tobe automatically executed on data after identification of at least onepotential error in the data uncovered during execution of the particularprofiling data quality rule on the data; and controlling the dataquality processing system to execute the particular profiling dataquality rule on particular data and, in response to determining that theparticular data includes at least one potential error during theexecution of the particular profiling data quality rule, execute theparticular cleansing data quality rule on the particular data comprisescontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularprofiling data quality rule on particular data and, in response todetermining that the particular data includes at least one potentialerror during the execution of the particular profiling data qualityrule, execute the two or more particular cleansing data quality rule onthe particular data.
 39. At least one non-transitory computer-readablestorage medium encoded with executable instructions that, when executedby at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to performoperations comprising: storing, in a rules repository, profiling dataquality rules, cleansing data quality rules, and linking data that linksprofiling data quality rules to cleansing data quality rules, thelinking data defining a particular cleansing data quality rule to beautomatically executed on data after identification of at least onepotential error in the data uncovered during execution of acorresponding particular profiling data quality rule on the data;managing the rules repository by managing the profiling data qualityrules stored in the rules repository, managing the cleansing dataquality rules stored in the rules repository, and managing the linkingdata stored in the rules repository; migrating data quality rules fromthe rules repository to a data quality processing system, the migrateddata quality rules including one or more linked pairs of data qualityrules that each have a profiling data quality rule linked to a cleansingdata quality rule by the linking data, the one or more linked pairs ofdata quality rules including a pair with the particular profiling dataquality rule and the particular cleansing data quality rule; andmanaging a data quality process performed by the data quality processingsystem using the migrated data quality rules, the managing includingcontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularprofiling data quality rule on particular data and, in response todetermining that the particular data includes at least one potentialerror during the execution of the particular profiling data qualityrule, execute the particular cleansing data quality rule on theparticular data.
 40. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39,wherein storing, in a rules repository, profiling data quality rules,cleansing data quality rules, and linking data that links profiling dataquality rules to cleansing data quality rules comprises storing theprofiling data quality rules, the cleansing data quality rules, and thelinking data in a generic format that is not specific to any particulardata quality processing system.
 41. The computer-readable storage mediumof claim 39, wherein managing the profiling data quality rules stored inthe rules repository, managing the cleansing data quality rules storedin the rules repository, and managing the linking data stored in therules repository comprises managing the profiling data quality rulesstored in the rules repository by accessing profiling and cleansing dataquality rules inferred from an analysis of data to be profiled orcleansed and storing the inferred profiling and cleansing data qualityrules in the rules repository.
 42. The computer-readable storage mediumof claim 41, comprising: generating the inferred profiling and cleansingdata quality rules by accessing the data to be profiled or cleansed,analyzing the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed in an attempt toinfer which profiling and cleansing data quality rules are appropriatefor assessing quality of the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed,and automatically, without user intervention, inferring one or moreprofiling and cleansing data quality rules that are appropriate based onthe analysis of the accessed data to be profiled or cleansed.
 43. Thecomputer-readable storage medium of claim 39, comprising: receiving, bya rules management module, user input defining a new profiling dataquality rule and a new cleansing data quality rule; and storing the newprofiling data quality rule and the new cleansing data quality rule inthe rules repository.
 44. The computer-readable storage medium of claim43, comprising: receiving, by the rules management module, user inputlinking the new profiling data quality rule to the new cleansing dataquality rule; and storing, by the rules management module in the rulesrepository, linking data that links the new profiling data quality ruleto the new cleansing data quality rule; recognizing, by a data qualityjob management module, that the new profiling data quality rule islinked to the new cleansing data quality rule based on the storedlinking data that links the new profiling data quality rule to the newcleansing data quality rule; controlling, by the data quality jobmanagement module, the data quality processing system to execute the newprofiling data quality rule to identify errors in data records; andbased on the recognition that the new profiling data quality rule islinked to the new cleansing data quality rule and without user inputafter controlling the data quality processing system to execute the newprofiling data quality rule, controlling, by the data quality jobmanagement module, the data quality processing system to execute the newcleansing data quality rule on the data records identified as havingerrors according to the new profiling data quality rule.
 45. Thecomputer-readable storage medium of claim 39, comprising: linking, by arules management module, profiling data quality rules with cleansingdata quality rules; organizing, by the rules management module,profiling data quality rules and cleansing data quality rules byindustry; and storing, by the rules management module in the rulesrepository, profiling data quality rules and cleansing data qualityrules organized by industry and with linking data that links profilingdata quality rules with cleansing data quality rules.
 46. Thecomputer-readable storage medium of claim 39, comprising modifying, by arules management module, data quality rules data in the rulesrepository.
 47. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39,wherein controlling the data quality processing system to execute theparticular cleansing data quality rule on the particular data comprisesautomatically, without user input, controlling the data qualityprocessing system to execute the particular cleansing data quality ruleon the particular data in response to determining that the particulardata includes at least one potential error during the execution of theparticular profiling data quality rule.
 48. The computer-readablestorage medium of claim 39, wherein the linking data for the particularprofiling data quality rule and the particular cleansing data qualityrule comprises an identifier for the particular cleansing data qualityrule and an identifier for the particular profiling data quality rule.49. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39, comprisingmonitoring, by a data quality job management module, the data qualityprocess performed by the data quality processing system using themigrated data quality rules.
 50. The computer-readable storage medium ofclaim 39, comprising monitoring, by a data quality job managementmodule, an entire operation of the data quality process performed by thedata quality processing system including monitoring results of dataprofiling performed by the data quality processing system and monitoringresults of data cleansing performed by the data quality processingsystem.
 51. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39, whereincontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularprofiling data quality rule on particular data comprises controlling thedata quality processing system to execute the one or more linked pairsof data quality rules in a coordinated manner.
 52. The computer-readablestorage medium of claim 39, the operations comprising: presenting, by adata quality job management module, data quality rules for selectionorganized by industry; receiving, by the data quality job managementmodule, user input selecting data quality rules to migrate; identifying,by the data quality job management module, the data quality processingsystem to which the selected data quality rules are to be migrated;transforming, by the data quality job management module, the selecteddata quality rules and data quality rules linked to the selected dataquality rules to a format suitable for the identified data qualityprocessing system; and sending, by the data quality job managementmodule, the transformed data quality rules to the identified dataquality processing system.
 53. The computer-readable storage medium ofclaim 52, the operations comprising: determining, by the data qualityjob management module, all other data quality rules that are linked tothe selected data quality rules and not included in the selected dataquality rules; transforming, by the data quality job management module,the other data quality rules to the format suitable for the identifieddata quality processing system; and sending, by the data quality jobmanagement module, the transformed other data quality rules to theidentified data quality processing system.
 54. The computer-readablestorage medium of claim 39, the operations comprising: identifying, fromamong multiple, different data quality processing systems and based onuser selection, the data quality processing system to which the dataquality rules are to be migrated; determining a format suitable for theidentified data quality processing system; and transforming the dataquality rules to the format suitable for the identified data qualityprocessing system.
 55. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39,the operations comprising: allowing the data quality processing systemto access data to be profiled and cleansed; and controlling the dataquality processing system to execute the migrated data quality rules onthe data to be profiled and cleansed.
 56. The computer-readable storagemedium of claim 55, the operations comprising: monitoring, by a dataquality job management module, results of profiling and cleansingperformed by the data quality processing system on the data to beprofiled and cleansed; generating, by the data quality job managementmodule, one or more reports that include information descriptive ofprofiling and cleansing performed by the data quality processing systembased on the results of profiling and cleansing performed by the dataquality processing system on the data to be profiled and cleansed;outputting, by the data quality job management module, the one or moregenerated reports; and providing, by the data quality job managementmodule, a cleansed version of the data to be profiled and cleansed. 57.The computer-readable storage medium of claim 39, wherein: storing, in arules repository, profiling data quality rules, cleansing data qualityrules, and linking data that links profiling data quality rules tocleansing data quality rules comprises storing, in the rules repository,particular linking data that links a particular profiling data qualityrule to two or more particular cleansing data quality rules, the linkingdata defining the two or more particular cleansing data quality rules tobe automatically executed on data after identification of at least onepotential error in the data uncovered during execution of the particularprofiling data quality rule on the data; and controlling the dataquality processing system to execute the particular profiling dataquality rule on particular data and, in response to determining that theparticular data includes at least one potential error during theexecution of the particular profiling data quality rule, execute theparticular cleansing data quality rule on the particular data comprisescontrolling the data quality processing system to execute the particularprofiling data quality rule on particular data and, in response todetermining that the particular data includes at least one potentialerror during the execution of the particular profiling data qualityrule, execute the two or more particular cleansing data quality rule onthe particular data.